Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 07 Mar 2012 22:02:44 +0100 | From | Richard Weinberger <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] MTD: UBI: Add checkpoint on-chip layout |
| |
Am 07.03.2012 17:09, schrieb Artem Bityutskiy: > On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 21:06 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Specify the on-chip checkpoint layout. >> The checkpoint consists of two major parts. >> A super block (identified via UBI_CP_SB_VOLUME_ID) and >> zero or more data blocks (identified via UBI_CP_DATA_VOLUME_ID). >> Data blocks are only used if whole checkpoint information does not fit >> into the super block. > > And superblock is also a more or less standard name used by file-system. > I easily imagine difficulties and confusion when discussing UBIFS and > UBI and mixing UBI and UBIFS supersblocks up. IMHO, anything unique is > much better, even if it does not make much sense. E.g., "boss block" or > "pomo block" (pomo = boss in Finnish). > > Would you consider picking a different name as well please? >
Will do.
Thanks, //richard
| |