lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm/memory_failure: Let the compiler add the function name
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:09:09AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I agree with your change, but I'm not sure these should be pr_info() to
> > start with, these seem more like debugging messages? I can't see how
> > they'd be useful in standard operation so could we just convert them to be
> > debug instead?
>
> Well it tells why the page recovery didn't work.
>
> Memory recovery is a somewhat obscure path, so it's better to have
> full information.

Nod, and it won't disturb the users unless something really bad happens.

I'm fine with the patch, too.

Thanks,
Fengguang


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-29 16:13    [W:0.043 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site