Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:53:06 -0500 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] seccomp_filter: syscall filtering using BPF | From | Will Drewry <> |
| |
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 2:36 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote: > On 03/14/2012 08:11 PM, Will Drewry wrote: >> Please see prior revisions of this patch series for a high >> level blurb. >> >> This revision makes a number of refinements and tweaks. The biggest >> change is a slight renumbering of the return codes which will break >> existing code using this patch series. >> >> I believe this patch is in good shape, and I don't see the need for >> any more API changes at this point. I plan to start using this revision >> more extensively, and I'd certainly appreciate any testing. >> >> Thanks! >> will >> > > x86 portions: > > Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Thanks!
> What is the preferred way to push this upstream? (Presumably for 3.5 at > this point, but we should get it into -next as soon as possible after > the merge window.)
A repost when rc1 has been cut is what's been suggested to me.
Additionally, two tweaks have been pointed out off list (documentation cruft and lack if #ifdef for asm/syscall.h), which I have fixed in my local and github tree but haven't yet reposted here. I was planning on just posting v17 when rc1 is cut (unless I've blithely missed it already) and then trying to pester everyone and anyone who can merge. :)
Maybe someone more authoritative than me will answer though.
thanks! will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |