Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Artem Bityutskiy <> | Subject | [PATCH v1 1/9] ext4: do not mark superblock as dirty unnecessarily | Date | Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:41:21 +0200 |
| |
From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Commit a0375156ca1041574b5d47cc7e32f10b891151b0 cleaned up superblock dirtying handling, but missed one place. This patch does what was intended: if we have the journal, then we update the superblock through the journal rather than doing this directly.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 4 +--- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index feaa82f..e040403 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -3924,10 +3924,8 @@ static int ext4_do_update_inode(handle_t *handle, ext4_update_dynamic_rev(sb); EXT4_SET_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_LARGE_FILE); - sb->s_dirt = 1; ext4_handle_sync(handle); - err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, - EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sbh); + err = ext4_handle_dirty_super(handle, sb); } } raw_inode->i_generation = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_generation); -- 1.7.7.6
| |