Messages in this thread | | | From | Kirill Tkhai <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH]sched_rt.c: Avoid unnecessary dequeue and enqueue of pushable tasks in set_cpus_allowed_rt() | Date | Sat, 17 Mar 2012 03:58:44 +0400 |
| |
Steven, what is about the patch from my previous message? Is everything ok?
Regards, Kirill
19.02.2012, 18:17, "Kirill Tkhai" <tkhai@yandex.ru>: > 13.02.2012, 21:23, "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>: > >> I wasn't on the Cc of the original message, but it was bounced to me >> awhile ago. I'm cleaning out my email and came across it. >> >> Can you send me the latest version of this patch, either against latest >> Linus, or against tip/master. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- Steve >> >> P.S. I'll be at ELC this week so it may not get processed right away. > > Migration status depends on a difference of weight from 0 and 1. > If weight > 1 (<= 1) and old weight <= 1 (> 1) then task becomes > pushable (or not pushable). We are not insterested in its exact > values, is it 3 or 4, for example. > > Now if we are changing affinity from a set of 3 cpus to a set of 4, the- > task will be dequeued and enqueued sequentially without important > difference in comparison with initial state. The only difference is in > internal representation of plist queue of pushable tasks and the fact > that the task may won't be the first in a sequence of the same priority > tasks. But it seems to me it gives nothing. > > Signed-off-by: Tkhai Kirill <tkhai@yandex.ru> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |