Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:15:56 -0600 | From | Jonathan Corbet <> | Subject | Re: cpu_active vs pcrypt & padata |
| |
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:13:08 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> Also, wth is all this kernel/padata.c stuff? There's next to no useful > comment in there and the only consumer seems to be pcrypt, does that > really need to be in kernel/ ?
FWIW I wrote that stuff up when it went in...
https://lwn.net/Articles/382257/
Might be helpful in case anybody else thinks they might want to use this facility. Maybe.
jon
| |