lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: [PATCH] Fix the race between smp_call_function and CPU booting
From
Date
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 00:11 +0000, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:peterz@infradead.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 5:43 PM
> > To: Liu, Chuansheng
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Yanmin Zhang; tglx@linutronix.de
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix the race between smp_call_function and CPU booting
> >
> > On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 06:27 +0000, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> > > On the unplug case, after set the CPU to !active, we do not need IPI
> > > handling for the corresponding CPU before it is set to offline. I did
> > > not find any impact that limiting the smp_call_function just after CPU
> > > is active.
> >
> > Have a look at Alpha, it's flush_tlb_mm() can use smp_call_function(), in
> > the !active,online case you very much still need to tlb flush that cpu.
> >
> > The fact that it works on a limited use case on x86 doesn't say anything much
> > at all.

> Thanks your pointing out, do you have any other perfect solution for this issue?
> As for the stress test result, advancing the setting active before setting online broken
> something either.

I'm not sure I understand.. are you saying that commit
5fbd036b552f633abb394a319f7c62a5c86a9cd7 in tip/master broke something?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-03-15 11:49    [W:0.124 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site