Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:51:08 -0400 | From | Chris Frey <> | Subject | Re: Linux 3.0.24 |
| |
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:37:49AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:23:22PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:34:51PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > I'm announcing the release of the 3.0.24 kernel. > > > > > > All users of the 3.0 kernel series must upgrade. > > > > Is the word "must" defined anywhere? > > Surely you have a dictionary somewhere? > > > > When I read it, it looks like there are serious patches included in > > this release, perhaps data integrity or security patches. But "must" > > has been in an awful lot of these release notes lately, that it makes > > me wonder if it is boilerplate. > > > > Just curious how to interpret this. > > Interpret it as written please.
Perhaps it would help if I phrased my question differently: What kind of bug makes you decide to write "must" instead of something else?
- Chris
| |