Messages in this thread | | | From | Yang Bai <> | Date | Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:06:28 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Makefile: fix error when gen TAGS |
| |
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > > What does ctags --version print out for you? I'm not aware of exuberant tags > outputting files called TAGS (although etags would do that and then this > patch wouldn't make sense).
hamo@trinity ~ $ ctags --version Exuberant Ctags 5.9~svn20110310, Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Darren Hiebert Compiled: Nov 9 2011, 03:17:31 Addresses: <dhiebert@users.sourceforge.net>, http://ctags.sourceforge.net Optional compiled features: +wildcards, +regex
hamo@trinity ~ $ etags --version Exuberant Ctags 5.9~svn20110310, Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Darren Hiebert Compiled: Nov 9 2011, 03:17:31 Addresses: <dhiebert@users.sourceforge.net>, http://ctags.sourceforge.net Optional compiled features: +wildcards, +regex
hamo@trinity ~ $ ls -l /usr/bin/etags lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Feb 8 17:48 /usr/bin/etags -> /etc/alternatives/etags hamo@trinity ~ $ ls -l /etc/alternatives/etags lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Feb 15 10:06 /etc/alternatives/etags -> /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant
So I think which kind of name Exuberant Ctags generates depends on argv[0].
> > It would be nice if etags was updated to take care of this forward > declaration removal. Care to send that patch? > Yes. I will send this patch soon.
| |