Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:52:04 -0600 | From | David Ahern <> | Subject | Re: [RFD] perf: Integrate logging facilities |
| |
On 3/12/12 3:58 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote: > This is a rough idea and there can be things I am missing. So I need to > listen to your advices.
What Arnaldo proposed was having core, library code return error codes and not print anything to the user. Higher layers (commands only?) can take the return error code and pass it to perf_<subsystem>_strerror() to dump a user friendly string for the error. See
http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/13/302
David
| |