Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: [PATCH 01/11] dmaengine: add context parameter toprep_slave_sgand prep_dma_cyclic | From | Vinod Koul <> | Date | Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:37:05 +0530 |
| |
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 09:02 -0800, Bounine, Alexandre wrote: > > What if we introduce another dma_transaction_type like DMA_SLAVE_EXT > (extended?). > In this case all devices that adhere to the generic SLAVE interface > still be > registered as DMA_SLAVE and those that do not follow generic route use > DMA_SLAVE_EXT. that way it would be channel specific not transaction specific as you had asked for...?
Again, how does this solve problem of passing parameters while preventing abuse...
-- ~Vinod
| |