Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:20:24 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/4] dmaengine: i.MX DMA series. | From | javier Martin <> |
| |
Hi Vinod,
On 22 February 2012 14:21, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 12:51 +0100, javier Martin wrote: >> On 10 February 2012 15:31, Javier Martin >> <javier.martin@vista-silicon.com> wrote: >> > Patches 1-3 have already been sent to the list (not merged yet) >> > but they are submitted so that everyone can get the whole picture >> > of what we're trying to do here. >> > >> > A new patch(4) has been added which adds support for multiple >> > descriptors. >> > >> > [PATCH 1/4] dmaengine: Add support for MEMCPY for imx-dma. >> > [PATCH 2/4] i.MX DMA: Add support for 2D transfers. >> > [PATCH 3/4] dmaengine: i.MX: Add support for interleaved transfers. >> > [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: Add support for multiple descriptors for imx-dma. >> >> Hi, >> what do you think of this series? >> >> Vinod: your concern about patch 1 is solved in patch 4 >> Sascha: I know you are not comfortable with patch 2 since it adds code >> to a file which is meant to be removed. However, is there a chance you >> accept it without me having to rewrite the whole series? > Without 2, I think this patch set looks okay. Sascha have you tested > this series, if so please let me know, I can apply the rest.
Please, note that if for whatever reason you don't apply patch 2 you must not apply patch 3 either. Because, as I stated, it depends completely on patch 2.
Regards. -- Javier Martin Vista Silicon S.L. CDTUC - FASE C - Oficina S-345 Avda de los Castros s/n 39005- Santander. Cantabria. Spain +34 942 25 32 60 www.vista-silicon.com
| |