lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH v2 0/2] signalfd/epoll fixes
On 02/23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Or we can rely on the fact that sighand_cachep is SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU,
> > and assume that ->whead is always rcu-protected if it can go away.
> >
> > In this case we don't need 3/4 (although it makes sense to add the
> > fat comment), and 4/4 can be simplified, see below.
>
> Ok.
>
> Can you also get rid of 1/4, because quite frankly, adding that
> BUG_ON() is just annoying. Either the thing gets fixed or not, but at
> no point is it ok to say "ok, I'm going to fix it, but before I do
> I'll just make it much worse".

OK. Please see v2.

Other changes:

- some comments

- now that we rely on rcu, ep_poll_callback() can do
remove_wait_queue() outsife of ep->lock



Davide, I see the new email, but it is too late for me to reply
today. Anyway, I think it makes sense to make the "simple" fix
before anything else. IOW, I'd suggest these changes for now in
any case (unless, of course, you see some problems).

Oleg.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-02-24 20:17    [W:0.069 / U:1.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site