Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:54:50 -0800 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] i387: stable kernel backport |
| |
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 03:18:03PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 02/23/2012 03:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > And a "clean" 3.2.7 doesn't have that problem? > > > > Does the same thing happen in Linus's tree at the moment? > > > > Clean 3.2.7 I don't think has that problem, although of course when I > run the stress test it fails on other ways so it's hard to 100% rule out. > > Linus' tree doesn't have that problems.
Ugh.
So, we need more testers, so let me release a -rc kernel with just these changes in it, to get a wider testing range, and make an easy "this kernel worked, but this one didn't" for people to work with.
I don't suppose that 'git bisect' would work for this, as it's really a "all or nothing" type thing with this series from what I can tell, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
| |