Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: compat: autofs v5 packet size ambiguity - update | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Date | Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:31:38 -0800 |
| |
However, I liked Linus' approach.of using the version ioctl; any reason not to?
Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 10:21 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: >> On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:54 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: >> > On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:48 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: >> > > On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 08:12 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> >wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Oh, DOH ... >> > > > > >> > > > > The process mounting the autofs mount is passing the pipe it >will use >> > > > > for communication via a mount option so we can do this right >in >> > > > > fill_super. >> > > > >> > > > No, we really cannot. >> > > >> > > Sorry, I think your wrong this time. >> > >> > On second thought, I suppose other user space users don't "have" to >use >> > mount(2) .... >> >> Thomas, what does systemd use to mount the autofs mounts that it >uses? > >Mmm ... AFAICS systemd uses mount(2) so that looks OK too. > >Ian
-- Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse my brevity and lack of formatting.
| |