Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:58:29 -0800 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 30/30] x32: Add x32 VDSO support |
| |
On 02/20/2012 04:12 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Would it make sense to remove the non-__vdso-prefixed weak symbols? > AFAICT they are somewhere between useless (because the __vdso symbols > are unambiguous), confusing (has anyone not read this and said "huh?"), > and wrong (they are not interchangeable with glibc's symbols as they > return different values). > > We're stuck with them on x86-64, but x32 is new and has no > backwards-compatibility issues. >
What about non-glibc?
-hpa
-- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
| |