lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subject[Consult]: Re: [PATCH] synclink fix ldisc buffer argument
Hello Paul Fulghum:

Firstly, sorry for my mistake:
I am a reporter (not reviewer), and not suitable to review maintainer's patch.
when you send relative patch, need not cc to me (I am not reviewer)

so:
could you send patch again (not need cc to me) ?
(and also it is better to mark me as Reported-by in your patch)

sorry for my mistake, again.

gchen.


于 2012年12月07日 10:15, Chen Gang 写道:
> Hello Greg Kroah-Hartman:
>
>
> 于 2012年12月04日 01:13, Paul Fulghum 写道:
>> Fix call to line discipline receive_buf by synclink drivers.
>> Dummy flag buffer argument is ignored by N_HDLC line discipline but might
>> be of insufficient size if accessed by a different line discipline
>> selected by mistake. flag buffer allocation now matches max size of data
>> buffer. Unused char_buf buffers are removed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@microgate.com>
>
> if no additional questions:
> is it suitable to let this patch pass checking ?
> at least for me, it is surely solve an issue, and no negative effect.
>
> now, maybe Paul Fulghum is busy...
> the left questions what I have sent seems minor.
> so they can be delayed, until he has free time.
>
> when Paul Fulghum has free time.
> can still check what my left questions whether valid.
> if they are valid, can send additional patch for them.
>
>
> is it OK ?
>
> Regards
>


--
Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-10 03:21    [W:0.095 / U:3.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site