lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: need help on a DEADLOCK problem related to function try_one_irq()
Ed,

On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Edward Donovan wrote:
> So, let me try to confirm some things now, so I can learn as I go. To
> spell out what's in the new patch:
>
> The later line,
>
> action = desc->action;
>
> should have been this all along?
>
> action = action->next;

Yes. My bad :(

> And with that fixed, the other test can go. Which is good, now,
> because it was creating locking problems for you.
>
> Ok, thanks for bearing with me. I'll repeat the test here, some
> more, but they've generally behaved consistently and probably will
> keep showing the same.
>
> I might as well add that I would happily ship one of these computers,
> with a reliably spurious interrupt, to Thomas in Germany. if that
> would help for testing.

I'm always happy to have machines which expose strange symptoms.

Thanks,

tglx


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-06 19:21    [W:0.184 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site