lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Look Ma, da kernel is b0rken
Hi Alan,

On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:47:49 +0000 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>
> And yes btw we should turn this option on in -next, and get these sort of
> things out of the tree for good. More importantly it'll mean anyone
> adding another one gets a whine on the spot.

While I appreciate your confidence, I don't notice quite a few new
warnings (because there are so many of them already :-(). Is there some
reason to not turn this on in our "normal" builds? Does it produce many
false positives? What compiler version is required?

I also currently don't carry patches that only ever appear in linux-next
(well, not intentionally anyway). I assume it would require a patch to
the Makefile(s) to turn this on.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-05 22:41    [W:0.112 / U:1.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site