Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 3 Dec 2012 18:11:26 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/52] RFC: Unified NUMA balancing tree, v1 |
| |
* Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> >Rik van Riel (1): > > sched, numa, mm: Add credits for NUMA placement > > Where did the TLB flush optimizations go? :)
They are still very much there, unchanged for a long time and acked by everyone - I thought I'd spare a few electrons by not doing a 60+ patches full resend.
Here is how it looks like in the full diffstat:
Rik van Riel (6): mm/generic: Only flush the local TLB in ptep_set_access_flags() x86/mm: Only do a local tlb flush in ptep_set_access_flags() x86/mm: Introduce pte_accessible() mm: Only flush the TLB when clearing an accessible pte x86/mm: Completely drop the TLB flush from ptep_set_access_flags() sched, numa, mm: Add credits for NUMA placement
I'm really fond of these btw., they make a real difference.
Thanks,
Ingo
| |