lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/52] RFC: Unified NUMA balancing tree, v1

* Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:

> >Rik van Riel (1):
> > sched, numa, mm: Add credits for NUMA placement
>
> Where did the TLB flush optimizations go? :)

They are still very much there, unchanged for a long time and
acked by everyone - I thought I'd spare a few electrons by not
doing a 60+ patches full resend.

Here is how it looks like in the full diffstat:

Rik van Riel (6):
mm/generic: Only flush the local TLB in ptep_set_access_flags()
x86/mm: Only do a local tlb flush in ptep_set_access_flags()
x86/mm: Introduce pte_accessible()
mm: Only flush the TLB when clearing an accessible pte
x86/mm: Completely drop the TLB flush from ptep_set_access_flags()
sched, numa, mm: Add credits for NUMA placement

I'm really fond of these btw., they make a real difference.

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-03 19:01    [W:0.189 / U:2.816 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site