lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: exynos5: add High Speed I2C controller driver
Hi,

On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 04:55:54PM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> Adds support for High Speed I2C driver found in Exynos5 and later
> SoCs from Samsung. This driver currently supports Auto mode.
>
> Driver only supports Device Tree method.
>
> Signed-off-by: Taekgyun Ko <taeggyun.ko@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> Fixed the comments from Felipe Balbi and Thomas Abraham.
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 7 +
> drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 652 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.h | 102 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 762 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> index bdca511..4caea76 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> @@ -618,6 +618,13 @@ config I2C_S3C2410
> Say Y here to include support for I2C controller in the
> Samsung SoCs.
>
> +config I2C_EXYNOS5
> + tristate "Exynos5 high-speed I2C driver"
> + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS5
> + help
> + Say Y here to include support for High-speed I2C controller in the
> + Exynos5 based Samsung SoCs.
> +
> config I2C_S6000
> tristate "S6000 I2C support"
> depends on XTENSA_VARIANT_S6000
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
> index 6181f3f..4b1548c 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_PUV3) += i2c-puv3.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_PXA) += i2c-pxa.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_PXA_PCI) += i2c-pxa-pci.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_S3C2410) += i2c-s3c2410.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_EXYNOS5) += i2c-exynos5.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_S6000) += i2c-s6000.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_SH7760) += i2c-sh7760.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_SH_MOBILE) += i2c-sh_mobile.o
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..7614f60
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,652 @@
> +/* linux/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c

no need for the full path. Generally this would look like:

* i2c-exynos5.c - Samsung Exynos 5 I2C Controller Driver

no strong feelings however.

> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + *
> + * High speed I2C controller driver
> + * for Exynos5 and later SoCs from Samsung.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +*/
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/time.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/of_i2c.h>
> +
> +#include "i2c-exynos5.h"

it doesn't look like this header is even needed. All those macros could
be defined here in the C-source file which is the only user.

> +#define EXYNOS5_I2C_TIMEOUT (msecs_to_jiffies(1000))
> +
> +/* timeout for pm runtime autosuspend */
> +#define EXYNOS5_I2C_PM_TIMEOUT 1000 /* ms */
> +
> +struct exynos5_i2c {
> + struct i2c_adapter adap;
> + unsigned int suspended:1;
> +
> + struct i2c_msg *msg;
> + unsigned int msg_idx;
> + struct completion msg_complete;
> + unsigned int msg_ptr;
> +
> + unsigned int irq;
> +
> + void __iomem *regs;
> + struct clk *clk;
> + struct device *dev;
> + int gpios[2];
> +
> + int bus_num;
> + int speed_mode;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id exynos5_i2c_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5-hsi2c" },
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, exynos5_i2c_match);
> +
> +/* TODO: Should go to debugfs */
> +static inline void dump_i2c_register(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c)
> +{
> + dev_vdbg(i2c->dev, "Register dump(%d) :\n %x\n %x\n %x\n %x\n"
> + " %x\n %x\n %x\n %x\n %x\n"
> + " %x\n %x\n %x\n %x\n %x\n"
> + " %x\n %x\n %x\n %x\n %x\n"
> + " %x\n %x\n %x\n %x\n %x\n",
> + i2c->suspended,
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_CTL),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_FIFO_CTL),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_TRAILIG_CTL),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_CLK_CTL),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_CLK_SLOT),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_INT_ENABLE),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_INT_STATUS),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_ERR_STATUS),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_FIFO_STATUS),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_TX_DATA),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_RX_DATA),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_CONF),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_AUTO_CONF),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_TIMEOUT),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_MANUAL_CMD),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_TRANS_STATUS),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_TIMING_HS1),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_TIMING_HS2),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_TIMING_HS3),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_TIMING_FS1),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_TIMING_FS2),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_TIMING_FS3),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_TIMING_SLA),
> + readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_ADDR));
> +}

NAK, please add debugfs support already. This will be here for a long
time otherwise

> +static inline void exynos5_i2c_stop(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c, int ret)

no need for inline, GCC will handle that. Also, this prototype looks
awkward, you're passing caller's return code to be checked here... it's
weird, to say the least.

> +{
> + dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "STOP\n");

I would call this dev_vdbg()

> +
> + i2c->msg_idx++;
> + if (ret)
> + i2c->msg_idx = ret;
> +
> + /* Disable interrrupts */
> + writel(0, i2c->regs + HSI2C_INT_ENABLE);
> + complete(&i2c->msg_complete);
> +}
> +
> +static void exynos5_i2c_en_timeout(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c)
> +{
> + unsigned long i2c_timeout = readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_TIMEOUT);
> +
> + /* Clear to enable Timeout */
> + i2c_timeout &= ~HSI2C_TIMEOUT_EN;
> + writel(i2c_timeout, i2c->regs + HSI2C_TIMEOUT);
> +}
> +
> +static void exynos5_i2c_master_run(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c)
> +{
> + /* Start data transfer in Master mode */
> + u32 i2c_auto_conf = readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_AUTO_CONF);
> + i2c_auto_conf |= HSI2C_MASTER_RUN;
> + writel(i2c_auto_conf, i2c->regs + HSI2C_AUTO_CONF);
> +}
> +
> +/* exynos5_i2c_set_bus
> + *
> + * get the i2c bus for a master/slave transaction
> + */

multiline comment style is wrong.

> +static int exynos5_i2c_set_bus(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c, int master)

this function is only called with master set to 1, do you even need that
argument ? Do you have some out-of-tree code for supporting slave mode ?

Please remove 'slave' support completely as that's not supported in
mainline as of today, if you need slave support, then add it to the
framework first.

> +{
> + unsigned long t_status;
> + int timeout = 400;
> +
> + while (timeout-- > 0) {
> + t_status = readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_TRANS_STATUS);
> +
> + if (master) {
> + if (!(t_status & HSI2C_MASTER_BUSY))
> + return 0;
> + } else {
> + if (!(t_status & HSI2C_SLAVE_BUSY))
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + msleep(20);
> + }
> +
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +}
> +
> +/* exynos5_i2c_irq
> + *
> + * top level IRQ servicing routine
> + */

multiline comment style is wrong.

> +static irqreturn_t exynos5_i2c_irq(int irqno, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct exynos5_i2c *i2c = dev_id;
> + unsigned long t_stat;
> + unsigned char byte;
> +
> + t_stat = readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_TRANS_STATUS);
> +
> + if (t_stat & HSI2C_TRANS_ABORT) {
> + /* deal with arbitration loss */
> + dev_err(i2c->dev, "deal with arbitration loss\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (i2c->msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) {
> + if (t_stat & HSI2C_TRANS_DONE) {
> + dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "Device found.");
> + while ((readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_FIFO_STATUS) &
> + HSI2C_RX_FIFO_EMPTY) == 0) {
> + byte = readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_RX_DATA);
> + dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "read rx_data = %x", byte);
> + i2c->msg->buf[i2c->msg_ptr++] = byte;
> + }
> + } else if (t_stat & HSI2C_NO_DEV) {
> + dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "No device found.");
> + exynos5_i2c_stop(i2c, -ENXIO);
> + } else if (t_stat & HSI2C_NO_DEV_ACK &&
> + !(i2c->msg->flags & I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK)) {
> + dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "No device Ack.");
> + exynos5_i2c_stop(i2c, -ENXIO);
> + }
> + } else {
> + byte = i2c->msg->buf[i2c->msg_ptr++];
> + dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "write tx_data = %x ", byte);
> + writel(byte, i2c->regs + HSI2C_TX_DATA);
> + }
> +
> + if (i2c->msg_ptr >= i2c->msg->len)
> + exynos5_i2c_stop(i2c, 0);
> +
> + out:
> + /* Set those bits to clear them */
> + writel(readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_INT_STATUS),
> + i2c->regs + HSI2C_INT_STATUS);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static void exynos5_i2c_message_start(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c,
> + struct i2c_msg *msgs)
> +{
> + unsigned long usi_ctl = HSI2C_FUNC_MODE_I2C | HSI2C_MASTER;
> + unsigned long i2c_auto_conf;
> + unsigned long i2c_addr = ((msgs->addr & 0x7f) << 10);
> + unsigned long usi_int_en = 0;
> +
> + exynos5_i2c_en_timeout(i2c);
> +
> + if (msgs->flags & I2C_M_RD) {
> + usi_ctl &= ~HSI2C_TXCHON;
> + usi_ctl |= HSI2C_RXCHON;
> +
> + i2c_auto_conf |= HSI2C_READ_WRITE;
> +
> + usi_int_en |= (HSI2C_INT_RX_ALMOSTFULL_EN |
> + HSI2C_INT_TRAILING_EN);
> + } else {
> + usi_ctl &= ~HSI2C_RXCHON;
> + usi_ctl |= HSI2C_TXCHON;
> +
> + i2c_auto_conf &= ~HSI2C_READ_WRITE;
> +
> + usi_int_en |= HSI2C_INT_TX_ALMOSTEMPTY_EN;
> + }
> +
> + writel(i2c_addr, i2c->regs + HSI2C_ADDR);
> + writel(usi_ctl, i2c->regs + HSI2C_CTL);
> +
> + i2c_auto_conf |= i2c->msg->len;
> + i2c_auto_conf |= HSI2C_STOP_AFTER_TRANS;
> + writel(i2c_auto_conf, i2c->regs + HSI2C_AUTO_CONF);
> +
> + exynos5_i2c_master_run(i2c);
> +
> + /* Enable appropriate interrupts */
> + writel(usi_int_en, i2c->regs + HSI2C_INT_ENABLE);
> +}
> +
> +static int exynos5_i2c_doxfer(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msgs)
> +{
> + unsigned long timeout;
> +
> + if (i2c->suspended) {
> + dev_err(i2c->dev, "HS-I2C is not initialzed.\n");
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + if (exynos5_i2c_set_bus(i2c, 1)) {
> + dev_err(i2c->dev, "cannot get bus, Master busy.\n");
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + }
> +
> + i2c->msg = msgs;
> + i2c->msg_ptr = 0;
> + i2c->msg_idx = 0;
> +
> + INIT_COMPLETION(i2c->msg_complete);
> +
> + exynos5_i2c_message_start(i2c, msgs);
> +
> + timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c->msg_complete,
> + EXYNOS5_I2C_TIMEOUT);
> +
> + if (timeout == 0)
> + dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "timeout\n");
> + else if (i2c->msg_idx != msgs->len)
> + dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "incomplete xfer (%d)\n", i2c->msg_idx);
> +
> + return i2c->msg_idx;
> +}
> +
> +static int exynos5_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> + struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
> +{
> + struct exynos5_i2c *i2c = (struct exynos5_i2c *)adap->algo_data;
> + int retry, i;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(i2c->dev);
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret))
> + goto out;
> +
> + clk_prepare_enable(i2c->clk);
> +
> + for (retry = 0; retry < adap->retries; retry++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> + ret = exynos5_i2c_doxfer(i2c, msgs);
> + msgs++;
> +
> + if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> + break;
> + }
> + if (i == num) {
> + clk_disable_unprepare(i2c->clk);
> + ret = i2c->msg_idx;
> + goto out;
> + }

why don't you just move this to the out label ?

> + dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "retrying transfer (%d)\n", retry);
> +
> + udelay(100);
> + }
> +
> + ret = -EREMOTEIO;
> + clk_disable_unprepare(i2c->clk);
> + out:
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(i2c->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(i2c->dev);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 exynos5_i2c_func(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
> +{
> + return I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct i2c_algorithm exynos5_i2c_algorithm = {
> + .master_xfer = exynos5_i2c_xfer,
> + .functionality = exynos5_i2c_func,
> +};
> +
> +static int exynos5_i2c_set_timing(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c, int speed_mode)
> +{
> + unsigned long i2c_timing_s1;
> + unsigned long i2c_timing_s2;
> + unsigned long i2c_timing_s3;
> + unsigned long i2c_timing_sla;
> + unsigned int op_clk;
> + unsigned int clkin = clk_get_rate(i2c->clk);
> + unsigned int n_clkdiv;
> + unsigned int t_start_su, t_start_hd;
> + unsigned int t_stop_su;
> + unsigned int t_data_su, t_data_hd;
> + unsigned int t_scl_l, t_scl_h;
> + unsigned int t_sr_release;
> + unsigned int t_ftl_cycle;
> + unsigned int i = 0, utemp0 = 0, utemp1 = 0, utemp2 = 0;
> +
> + if (speed_mode == HSI2C_HIGH_SPD)
> + op_clk = HSI2C_HS_TX_CLOCK;
> + else
> + op_clk = HSI2C_FS_TX_CLOCK;
> +
> + /* FPCLK / FI2C =
> + * (CLK_DIV + 1) * (TSCLK_L + TSCLK_H + 2) + 8 + 2 * FLT_CYCLE
> + * uTemp0 = (CLK_DIV + 1) * (TSCLK_L + TSCLK_H + 2)
> + * uTemp1 = (TSCLK_L + TSCLK_H + 2)
> + * uTemp2 = TSCLK_L + TSCLK_H
> + */

wrong indentation

(back to my vacations now)

--
balbi
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-28 00:41    [W:1.349 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site