[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 3/3 -v2] x86,smp: auto tune spinlock backoff delay factor
On 12/27/2012 01:41 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> Rik van Riel <> 12/27/12 4:01 PM >>>
>> On 12/27/2012 09:27 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> So the hash sounds good to me, because the hash key could mix both lock
>>> address and caller IP ( __builtin_return_address(1) in
>>> ticket_spin_lock_wait())
>> The lock acquisition time depends on the holder of the lock,
>> and what the CPUs ahead of us in line will do with the lock,
>> not on the caller IP of the spinner.
> The lock holder could supply its __builtin_return_address(0) for use
> in eventual hashing.
> Also, with all of this - did you evaluate the alternative of using
> monitor/mwait instead?

How much bus traffic do monitor/mwait cause behind the scenes?

All rights reversed

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-27 20:41    [W:0.097 / U:0.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site