lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] Revert "perf: Require exclude_guest to use PEBS - kernel side enforcement"
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:21:23PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 12/19/12 8:07 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >This reverts commit 20b279ddb38ca42f8863cec07b4d45ec24589f13.
> >
> >Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> >Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> >Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> >Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> >Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> >Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
>
> As a courtesy please CC people involved in a commit on any revert request.
>
> Arnaldo: please do not take this patch; I have proposed an
> alternative. Just waiting to hear back on its acceptability.
>
> David

this one was not meant to be applied.. just wanted the precise
to work, so I could test other stuff.. I did mention that in:

[RFC 0/3] perf tests: Adding precise event attribute test
---
I based this on revert (Patch 1) discussed in [1]. I'm not sure
this revert will tak place at the end, but I wanted to get some
feedback on the 'precise' attribute first.
...
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135536724805356&w=2
---

jirka


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-24 15:21    [W:8.779 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site