lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 03/25] sja1000: don't use [delayed_]work_pending()
Date
There's no need to test whether a (delayed) work item in pending
before queueing, flushing or cancelling it. Most uses are unnecessary
and quite a few of them are buggy.

Remove unnecessary pending tests from sja1000. Only compile tested.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
Please let me know how this patch should be routed. I can take it
through the workqueue tree if necessary.

Thanks.

drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c
index d84888f..600ac72 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/peak_pci.c
@@ -339,8 +339,7 @@ static void peak_pciec_set_leds(struct peak_pciec_card *card, u8 led_mask, u8 s)
*/
static void peak_pciec_start_led_work(struct peak_pciec_card *card)
{
- if (!delayed_work_pending(&card->led_work))
- schedule_delayed_work(&card->led_work, HZ);
+ schedule_delayed_work(&card->led_work, HZ);
}

/*
--
1.8.0.2


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-22 03:41    [W:0.543 / U:0.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site