Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Dec 2012 04:57:31 +0000 | From | Al Viro <> | Subject | Re: new architectures, time_t __kernel_long_t |
| |
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:18:01PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The other types that are used as 64 bit on x32 are ino_t, nlink_t, > size_t, ssize_t, ptrdiff_t, and off_t.
*Kernel-side* we should not give a damn about the userland nlink_t, period. Making it architecture-dependent had been a bad mistake that essentially made nlink_t useless for the kernel. That mistake had been fixed; please, do not bring it back. If some userland structure needs to include a field encoding nlink_t values, please use an explicitly-sized type when refering to it kernel-side.
The same should've been true for mode_t, but for historical reasons we are using umode_t for just about everything and IMO we should kill the last references to mode_t anywhere kernel-side (again, explicitly-sized types for userland st_mode and friends on the last few architectures still refering to mode_t there) and just rename umode_t to mode_t; I'm sick and tired of playing whack-a-mole with code using (arch-dependent) mode_t for kernel data. And no, it's not always harmless - we had rather ugly bugs based on that.
| |