lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 32kHz clock removal causes problems omap_hsmmc
On 12/19/2012 11:45 AM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
>> Well, we still haven't got the foggiest idea what the actual problem is
>> beyond that it's probably related to the 32kHz clock in some way (unless
>> it was one of the other reverts that coincidentally made a difference,
>> but we don't know what they were) so it's unlikely that just randomly
>> implementing clock support is going to fix anything immediately here.
>
> This is exactly what I had to revert (as I mentioned in the other email,
> I had to revert the other patches otherwise compilation would break):
>
> 0e8e5c34 "regulator: twl: Remove references to 32kHz clock from DT bindings"
> e76ab829 "regulator: twl: Remove references to the twl4030 regulator"
> 029dd3ce "regulator: twl: Remove another unused variable warning"

Yeah. 32k clock is not provided by twl.

As I said I need to take a look at CCF to see if it already there. If it is
clock driver + mapping + patch for wl12xx should fix the issue you are facing.

> Let me know if you need more info.

BTW: have you happened to ubdate u-boot recently? There is a nice easter egg
added there:
f3f98bb ARM: OMAP4/5: Do not configure non essential pads, clocks, dplls.

Which means that _essential_ clocks and pads are no longer configured.

--
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-19 12:41    [W:0.084 / U:0.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site