lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V3 RFC 1/2] sched: Bail out of yield_to when source and target runqueue has one task
[I forgot to do TO to Ingo last time]

Ingo,
Could you please take this into x86 tree.
This is
Acked-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>

Marcelo, do you want to add your Acked-by/Reviewed-by?

On 12/14/2012 09:10 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Could you please take this into x86 tree?
>
> Thanks,
> On 12/14/2012 05:59 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> Raghavendra,
>>
>> Please get this integrate through x86 tree (Ingo CC'ed).
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:37:54PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>>> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>>>
>>> In case of undercomitted scenarios, especially in large guests
>>> yield_to overhead is significantly high. when run queue length of
>>> source and target is one, take an opportunity to bail out and return
>>> -ESRCH. This return condition can be further exploited to quickly come
>>> out of PLE handler.
>>>
>>> (History: Raghavendra initially worked on break out of kvm ple
>>> handler upon
>>> seeing source runqueue length = 1, but it had to export rq length).
>>> Peter came up with the elegant idea of return -ESRCH in scheduler
>>> core.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>>> Raghavendra, Checking the rq length of target vcpu condition
>>> added.(thanks Avi)
>>> Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> kernel/sched/core.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>>> index 2d8927f..fc219a5 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>>> @@ -4289,7 +4289,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(yield);
>>> * It's the caller's job to ensure that the target task struct
>>> * can't go away on us before we can do any checks.
>>> *
>>> - * Returns true if we indeed boosted the target task.
>>> + * Returns:
>>> + * true (>0) if we indeed boosted the target task.
>>> + * false (0) if we failed to boost the target.
>>> + * -ESRCH if there's no task to yield to.
>>> */
>>> bool __sched yield_to(struct task_struct *p, bool preempt)
>>> {
>>> @@ -4303,6 +4306,15 @@ bool __sched yield_to(struct task_struct *p,
>>> bool preempt)
>>>
>>> again:
>>> p_rq = task_rq(p);
>>> + /*
>>> + * If we're the only runnable task on the rq and target rq also
>>> + * has only one task, there's absolutely no point in yielding.
>>> + */
>>> + if (rq->nr_running == 1 && p_rq->nr_running == 1) {
>>> + yielded = -ESRCH;
>>> + goto out_irq;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> double_rq_lock(rq, p_rq);
>>> while (task_rq(p) != p_rq) {
>>> double_rq_unlock(rq, p_rq);
>>> @@ -4310,13 +4322,13 @@ again:
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (!curr->sched_class->yield_to_task)
>>> - goto out;
>>> + goto out_unlock;
>>>
>>> if (curr->sched_class != p->sched_class)
>>> - goto out;
>>> + goto out_unlock;
>>>
>>> if (task_running(p_rq, p) || p->state)
>>> - goto out;
>>> + goto out_unlock;
>>>
>>> yielded = curr->sched_class->yield_to_task(rq, p, preempt);
>>> if (yielded) {
>>> @@ -4329,11 +4341,12 @@ again:
>>> resched_task(p_rq->curr);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -out:
>>> +out_unlock:
>>> double_rq_unlock(rq, p_rq);
>>> +out_irq:
>>> local_irq_restore(flags);
>>>
>>> - if (yielded)
>>> + if (yielded > 0)
>>> schedule();
>>>
>>> return yielded;
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>>
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-19 07:21    [W:0.205 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site