lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Strange results of DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST
Date
Hi Guenter,

Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 04:03:41PM +0100, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> > commit 263a523d18bca306016d75f5c8d5c57c37fe52fb changes the code of
> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST in include/linux/kernel.h to fix a compile time
> > warning.
> >
> > But now feeding in a zero into this macro results into 4198403. Tested
> > with gcc 4.4.3 and 4.7.2, on arch x86 and ARM.
> >
> > I can reproduce this behaviour, when my ADC delivers a '0' value in the
> > driver drivers/hwmon/s3c-hwmon.c in function s3c_hwmon_ch_show() with a
> > current 3.7.1 kernel. The value is correct again, when the ADC delivers
> > at least a '1'.
> >
> > Any ideas how to fix it correctly?
>
> Odd one. I ran the macro through a large number of values and divisors as
> well as various optimization options, with different compilers, and always
> get correct results.
>
> What are your compile options, and what are the channel multiplier and
> dividers set to ?

Refer the lines 177 to 182 in drivers/hwmon/s3c-hwmon.c. "cfg->mult" is '3300'
in my case, and "cfg->div" is '1023'. And whenever s3c_hwmon_read_ch()
returns '0' line 184 returns '4198403' since Linux-3.6. checked with my
gcc-4.6.2 cross compiler for Linux-3.6 and with gcc-4.6.2 for Linux-3.7.

I did a quick test with this macro on my host with gcc-4.4.3 and a simple
userland program and surprise, surprise:

result = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(0, 1023);

works as expected (result is 0), but

int x = 0;
unsigned y = 1023;
result = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(x, y);

gives me result = 4198403!

Strange.

Regards,
Juergen

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert |
Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-18 22:41    [W:0.068 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site