lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] arch/tile: implement user_regset interface on tilegx
On 12/17/2012 5:07 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>> I think with this support added, we have all the prerequisites to add "select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK" under "config TILE" in arch/tile/Kconfig, so we might as well do that too. That will enable PTRACE_GETREGSET and PTRACE_SETREGSET, as well as /proc/PID/syscall, so why not?
> This is indeed my objective ;), and it is an intermediate objective to
> add support for HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS. If we look at arch/Kconfig,
> just above HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK, we still have
>
> TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE calls tracehook_report_syscall_{entry,exit}
> TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME calls tracehook_notify_resume()
> signal delivery calls tracehook_signal_handler()

I believe we do properly support TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE; see arch/tile/kernel/intvec_64.S. Likewise TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME; see do_work_pending() in arch/tile/kernel/process.c. And signal delivery seems to be handled in a platform-independent way now; see kernel/signal.c.

My only comment on the revised patch is that I believe you should #include <arch/chip.h>, not <uapi/arch/chip.h>. Source code (.c files) doesn't seem to use the <uapi/> prefix.

--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-18 00:21    [W:0.096 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site