Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:40:14 +0000 | From | Russell King - ARM Linux <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] CLK: uninline clk_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare() |
| |
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:50:44PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 16 December 2012 17:27, Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:10:36PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> On 20 November 2012 14:52, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > We'll need to invoke clk_disable_unprepare() via a pointer in our devm_* > >> > conversion so let's uninline the pair. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> > >> > >> Mike, are you taking these patches? > > > > And what about my comments, some of which you've failed to reply to? > > Surprised!! I thought there was nothing missing after the last > discussion i remember. > Dmitry agreed to drop the first patch and all other looked fine, as > nobody objected > to them again. Yes, you did in the beginning but there were valid > replies to them, on > which you never objected. > > So, i thought its all good now. Can you point again to the issues still left ?
Well, there's my comment against patch 2 which never got a reply:
"Again, what about stuff not using drivers/clk/clk.c ?"
Has this been addressed?
| |