Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:13:55 +1100 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree |
| |
Hi Chris,
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:52:41 -0500 Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:15:04PM -0700, Chris Mason wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 04:00:22PM -0700, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Josef and I have sob on all of our commits (at least all the ones not in > > 3.7, I didn't go back farther). In this case the Author was Stefan and > > it ended up rebased in either Josef's or my tree. We usually try to > > preserve merges on rebase, but this time was a bigger set of changes > > than usual and it didn't work out. > > Just FYI, I've pushed out a fixed version of the tree with proper > signed-off-by on all the commits, thanks for catching that. > > It also has the fix for the ppc compile problems. (This isn't a pull > request yet, I've got the hash collision fix and a few others pending as > well).
You do realise that I just fetch your tree/branch each day, right? So it will be in tomorrow's linux-next.
-- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |