lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode_intel_early.c: Early update ucode on Intel's CPU
From
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:46 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I suspect we don't need init_level4_pgt at all and should just plan to
>>> get rid of it. Is there any reason we can't just build the proper
>>> kernel page table set in pagetable_init() and switch to it there?
>>
>> then how to pass the info to AP?
>
> also we should merge early_level4_pgt with init_level4_pgt.
>
> and #PE handler could just extend to use BRK ...
>
> but need to make sure BRK get mapped at first, and BRK could cross the
> 1G, 512G boundary ...
>
> that could make things less impact to all.

I tailored your patch and made use 2M page increase to replace patch
ioremap function.

[PATCH v6 12/27] x86: use io_remap to access real_mode_data

and it will extend init_level4_pgt to map extra range. that will limit
affect to even others.

please check if that is ok to you.

Thanks

Yinghai
[unhandled content-type:application/octet-stream]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-15 09:21    [W:0.156 / U:0.816 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site