lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] Fix cap_capable to only allow owners in the parent user namespace to have caps.
Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com):
>
> Andy Lutomirski pointed out that the current behavior of allowing the
> owner of a user namespace to have all caps when that owner is not in a
> parent user namespace is wrong.

To make sure I understand right, the issue is when a uid is mapped
into multiple namespaces, i.e. uid 1000 in ns1 may own ns2, but uid
1000 in ns3 does not?

> This is a bug introduced by the kuid conversion which made it possible
> for the owner of a user namespace to live in a child user namespace. I
> goofed and totally missed this implication.
>
> Serge and can you please take a look and see if my corrected cap_capable
> reads correctly to you.
>
> Andy or anyone else that wants to give me a second eyeball and double
> check me on this I would appreciate it.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>

> ---
>
> diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
> index 6dbae46..4639f44 100644
> --- a/security/commoncap.c
> +++ b/security/commoncap.c
> @@ -70,37 +70,44 @@ int cap_netlink_send(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> *
> * NOTE WELL: cap_has_capability() cannot be used like the kernel's capable()
> * and has_capability() functions. That is, it has the reverse semantics:
> * cap_has_capability() returns 0 when a task has a capability, but the
> * kernel's capable() and has_capability() returns 1 for this case.
> */
> int cap_capable(const struct cred *cred, struct user_namespace *targ_ns,
> int cap, int audit)
> {
> for (;;) {
> - /* The owner of the user namespace has all caps. */
> - if (targ_ns != &init_user_ns && uid_eq(targ_ns->owner, cred->euid))
> - return 0;
> + struct user_namespace *parent_ns;
>
> /* Do we have the necessary capabilities? */
> if (targ_ns == cred->user_ns)
> return cap_raised(cred->cap_effective, cap) ? 0 : -EPERM;
>
> /* Have we tried all of the parent namespaces? */
> if (targ_ns == &init_user_ns)
> return -EPERM;
>
> + parent_ns = targ_ns->parent;
> +
> + /*
> + * The owner of the user namespace in the parent user
> + * namespace has all caps.
> + */
> + if ((parent_ns == cred->user_ns) && uid_eq(targ_ns->owner, cred->euid))
> + return 0;
> +
> /*
> - *If you have a capability in a parent user ns, then you have
> + * If you have a capability in a parent user ns, then you have
> * it over all children user namespaces as well.
> */
> - targ_ns = targ_ns->parent;
> + targ_ns = parent_ns;
> }
>
> /* We never get here */
> }
>
> /**
> * cap_settime - Determine whether the current process may set the system clock
> * @ts: The time to set
> * @tz: The timezone to set
> *


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-14 04:41    [W:0.105 / U:0.900 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site