Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:53:09 +0900 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/12] regulator: gpio-regulator: Demote GPIO Regulator driver to start later |
| |
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:55:24AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> I understand your logic, hence why I wrote such a lengthy commit > message. However, I'm not sure I see a logical way around it. Asking > all users of MMCI to provide a not-regulator to declare that a > secondary regulator isn't available seems a little unreasonable to me.
> Is there anything else we can do?
Have all the people setting up this secondary regulator explicitly declare it?
| |