[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm: add node physical memory range to sysfs
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 17:48 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 12/12/2012 05:18 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 16:17 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >> Seems like the better way to do this would be to expose the DIMMs
> >> themselves in some way, and then map _those_ back to a node.
> >
> > Good point, and from a DIMM perspective, I agree, and will look into
> > this. However, IMHO, having the range of physical addresses for every
> > node still provides valuable information, from a NUMA point of view. For
> > example, dealing with node related e820 mappings.
> But if we went and did it per-DIMM (showing which physical addresses and
> NUMA nodes a DIMM maps to), wouldn't that be redundant with this
> proposed interface?

If DIMMs overlap between nodes, then we wouldn't have an exact range for
a node in question. Having both approaches would complement each other.

> How do you plan to use this in practice, btw?

It started because I needed to recognize the address of a node to remove
it from the e820 mappings and have the system "ignore" the node's


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-13 04:21    [W:0.076 / U:1.988 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site