lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] Automatic NUMA Balancing V11
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 08:27:41AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:03:38 +0000 Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > This is a pull request for "Automatic NUMA Balancing V11". The list
> > of changes since commit f4a75d2eb7b1e2206094b901be09adb31ba63681:
> >
> > Linux 3.7-rc6 (2012-11-16 17:42:40 -0800)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mel/linux-balancenuma.git balancenuma-v11
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to 4fc3f1d66b1ef0d7b8dc11f4ff1cc510f78b37d6:
> >
> > mm/rmap, migration: Make rmap_walk_anon() and try_to_unmap_anon() more scalable (2012-12-11 14:43:00 +0000)
> >
> > <SNIP>
> > These reports were quite late in the cycle so I/we would like to start
> > with this tree as it contains much of the code we can agree on and has
> > not changed significantly over the last 2-3 weeks.
>
> It has, however all been rebased from what still exists in the linux-next
> tree (as part of the tip tree).
>

What's in the tip tree is not the same even though there are
similarities. I know that bypassing linux-next like this is not the done
thing but it was not possible to have this tree in linux-next before
now. After this mail https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/11/62 my expectation
is that that the numacore bits from tip that were included in linux-next
will not be pulled this time. However, due to some of the similarities
I'm hoping that the collisions due to pulling this tree will not be too
severe.

--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-13 02:01    [W:0.129 / U:1.808 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site