lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC v1 01/16] lib: devres: don't enclose pcim_*() functions in CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
> Correct.  If HAS_IOPORT is not selected then we are potentially missing
> the dependent functions (because the platform has no IOPORT support) _or_
> it does have ISA/PCI IO spaces _but_ they're not mappable via the
> ioport_map() mechanism due to some non-linearity involved in the
> translation.
>
> To make that second point clear, that's platforms where:
>
> ioport_map(addr + 4) != ioport_map(addr) + 4.

For inb/inw and friends this shouldn't matter.

You can implement inl for example

as

if (unlikely(addr & 3))
// or in fact BUG on this for almost all h/w
uninlined_hard_slow_inl(addr);
else
return *(u32 *)iospace_map[addr];








\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-11 19:21    [W:0.077 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site