Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 07 Nov 2012 19:57:14 -0600 | From | Chris Friesen <> | Subject | Re: scsi target, likely GPL violation |
| |
On 11/07/2012 07:02 PM, Jon Mason wrote: > I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, but if > I understand the GPL correctly, RTS only needs to provide the relevant > source to their customers upon request.
Not quite.
Assuming the GPL applies, and that they have modified the code, then they must either:
1) include the source with the distributed binary
or
2) include with the binary an offer to provide the source to *any* third party
Chris
| |