lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 2/2] procfs: /proc/sched_debug fails on very very large machines.
On 11/06/2012 05:49 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 05:24:15PM -0600, Nathan Zimmer wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 04:31:28PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 03:02:21PM -0600, Nathan Zimmer wrote:
> > > > On systems with 4096 cores attemping to read /proc/sched_debug fails.
> > > > We are trying to push all the data into a single kmalloc buffer.
> > > > The issue is on these very large machines all the data will not fit in 4mb.
> > > >
> > > > A better solution is to not us the single_open mechanism but to provide
> > > > our own seq_operations and treat each cpu as an individual record.
> > >
> > > Good timing.
> > >
> > > This looks like it would solve the problem I just reported here:
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/6/390
> > >
> > > That happens even on an 8-way, so it's not just niche machines that have
> > > this problems.
> >
> > Glad to help. I hadn't thought of memory tight situation but it does make sense
> > that it helps as it can get by with 4k allocation vs grabbing successively
> > large chucks.
> >
> > If you have seen similar issues with your fuzz testing let me know where and
> > I'll take a look.
>
> I think /proc/timer_list could probably use the same treatment.
> I had traces showing that using 64k allocations too, but I think I may have
> just bricked my testbox.
>
> Dave
>

Yup it looks like /proc/timer_list is doing the thing with single open.

nzimmer@harp50-sys:~> cat /proc/timer_list
cat: /proc/timer_list: Cannot allocate memory
nzimmer@harp50-sys:~>

I'll see if I can squeeze that one in too.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-07 17:41    [W:0.262 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site