lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support
Date
On Monday, November 05, 2012 09:54:37 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Saturday, November 03, 2012 01:42:02 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Mika Westerberg
> >> <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> > ACPI 5 introduced SPISerialBus resource that allows us to enumerate and
> >> > configure the SPI slave devices behind the SPI controller. This patch adds
> >> > support for this to the SPI core.
> >> >
> >> > In addition we bind ACPI nodes to SPI devices. This makes it possible for
> >> > the slave drivers to get the ACPI handle for further configuration.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> >> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/spi/spi.c | 231 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>
> >> > +static acpi_status acpi_spi_add_resources(struct acpi_resource *res, void *data)
> >> > +{
> >> > + struct acpi_spi_device_info *info = data;
> >> > + struct acpi_resource_spi_serialbus *sb;
> >> > + struct spi_device *spi = info->spi;
> >> > +
> >> > + switch (res->type) {
> >> > + case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_SERIAL_BUS:
> >> > + sb = &res->data.spi_serial_bus;
> >> > + if (sb->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_SERIAL_TYPE_SPI) {
> >> > + spi->chip_select = sb->device_selection;
> >> > + spi->max_speed_hz = sb->connection_speed;
> >> > +
> >> > + /* Mode (clock phase/polarity/etc. */
> >> > + if (sb->clock_phase == ACPI_SPI_SECOND_PHASE)
> >> > + spi->mode |= SPI_CPHA;
> >> > + if (sb->clock_polarity == ACPI_SPI_START_HIGH)
> >> > + spi->mode |= SPI_CPOL;
> >> > + if (sb->device_polarity == ACPI_SPI_ACTIVE_HIGH)
> >> > + spi->mode |= SPI_CS_HIGH;
> >> > +
> >> > + /*
> >> > + * The info is valid once we have found the
> >> > + * SPISerialBus resource.
> >> > + */
> >> > + info->valid = true;
> >> > + }
> >> > + break;
> >> > +
> >> > + case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ:
> >> > + info->gsi = res->data.irq.interrupts[0];
> >> > + info->triggering = res->data.irq.triggering;
> >> > + info->polarity = res->data.irq.polarity;
> >> > + break;
> >> > +
> >> > + case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_IRQ:
> >> > + info->gsi = res->data.extended_irq.interrupts[0];
> >> > + info->triggering = res->data.extended_irq.triggering;
> >> > + info->polarity = res->data.extended_irq.polarity;
> >>
> >> A driver doesn't seem like the right place for _CRS parsing code.
> >
> > This is not a driver, however. :-)
>
> OK. Can you describe what this is? I assume the picture involves an
> SPI master device and one or more SPI slave devices, and the ACPI
> namespace tells us something about them, and somehow this code is
> related to those devices because it's looking at _CRS for them.

This is part of the SPI core that looks for SPI devices below a controller.

> A _CRS method is associated with a Device in the namespace. What is
> that device in this case?

An SPI device below a controller.

> What is its PNP ID?

I can't answer that from the top of my head, sorry.

> What driver claims devices with that ID?

The driver that declares support for it in its acpi_match_table[] array.


> >> > +static void acpi_register_spi_devices(struct spi_master *master)
> >> > +{
> >> > + acpi_status status;
> >> > + acpi_handle handle;
> >> > +
> >> > + handle = master->dev.acpi_handle;
> >> > + if (!handle)
> >> > + return;
> >> > +
> >> > + status = acpi_spi_enumerate(handle, acpi_spi_add_device, master);
> >>
> >> How does this work with hot-plug? acpi_spi_enumerate() walks a
> >> portion of the namespace. How do we deal with changes to that part of
> >> the namespace? For example, what happens if this part of the
> >> namespace gets pruned because an enclosing device is removed? Is
> >> there a way to discover new SPI devices if they get added?
> >
> > Yes, there should be a way to do that eventually. No, we don't have any
> > removable SPI devices described by ACPI yet, as far as I know. So even if
> > we added code for that now, we wouldn't be able to test it anyway with any
> > real hardware until such devices become available. I have no idea when that's
> > going to happen, though.
>
> I'm not asking about hotplug of devices on an SPI bus. I'm asking
> about hotplug of SPI masters. For example, let's say you hot-add a
> whole node that contains an SPI master. I assume there's some ACPI
> Device node that describes the SPI master, and a hot-add would add a
> subtree to the namespace that contains a new SPI master Device.

The master will be a platform device and again, we're going to add support
for the hotplug of those, but the SPI controllers that we currently can test
it with are not removable.

Thanks,
Rafael


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-06 15:04    [W:0.216 / U:0.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site