lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
    On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:46:32PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
    > Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> writes:
    >
    > > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 11:16:12AM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
    > >> Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> writes:
    > >> > No, in the general case the system will do that once it fails to find a
    > >> > bootable OS on the drive.
    > >>
    > >> In the general case there will be a bootable OS on the drive.
    > >
    > > That's in no way a given.
    >
    > You have it backwards. The conclusion here is that having a case where
    > a non-interactive install is possible is not a given.

    I deal with customers who perform non-interactive installs. The fact
    that you don't care about that use case is entirely irrelevant to me,
    because you're not the person that I am obliged to satisfy.

    --
    Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-11-06 05:02    [W:4.132 / U:0.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site