lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm: fix NULL checking in dma_pool_create()
On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:50:32 -0500
Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11/5/12 3:37 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Well, the dma_pool_create() kerneldoc does not describe dev==NULL to be
> > acceptable usage and given the lack of oops reports, we can assume that
> > no code is calling this function with dev==NULL.
> >
> > So I think we can just remove the code which handles dev==NULL?
>
> Actually, a quick grep gives the following...
>
> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dma.c:731: dma_pool = dma_pool_create("DMA-LLI", NULL, sizeof(struct pl080s_lli), 16, 0);
> drivers/usb/gadget/amd5536udc.c:3136: dev->data_requests = dma_pool_create("data_requests", NULL,
> drivers/usb/gadget/amd5536udc.c:3148: dev->stp_requests = dma_pool_create("setup requests", NULL,
> drivers/net/wan/ixp4xx_hss.c:973: if (!(dma_pool = dma_pool_create(DRV_NAME, NULL,
> drivers/net/ethernet/xscale/ixp4xx_eth.c:1106: if (!(dma_pool = dma_pool_create(DRV_NAME, NULL,
>

OK, so it seems that those drivers have never been tested on a
CONFIG_NUMA kernel. whee.

So we have a large amount of code here which ostensibly supports
dev==NULL but which has not been well tested. Take a look at
dma_alloc_coherent(), dma_free_coherent() - are they safe? Unobvious.

dmam_pool_destroy() will clearly cause an oops:

devres_destroy()
->devres_remove()
->spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->devres_lock, flags);


So what to do?

I'm thinking we should disallow dev==NULL. We have a lot of code in
mm/dmapool.c which _attempts_ to support this case, but is largely
untested and obviously isn't working. I don't think it's a good idea
to try to fix up and then support this case on behalf of a handful of
scruffy drivers. It would be better to fix the drivers, then simplify
the core code. drivers/usb/gadget/amd5536udc.c can probably use
dev->gadget.dev and drivers/net/wan/ixp4xx_hss.c can probably use
port->netdev->dev, etc.

So how about we add a WARN_ON_ONCE(dev == NULL), notify the driver maintainers
and later we can remove all that mm/dmapool.c code which is trying to
handle dev==NULL?



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-05 23:01    [W:0.055 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site