Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:09:26 +0100 | From | Thomas Hellstrom <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/ttm: Optimize reservation slightly |
| |
On 11/05/2012 03:01 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hey, > > Op 05-11-12 14:31, Thomas Hellstrom schreef: >> Reservation locking currently always takes place under the LRU spinlock. >> Hence, strictly there is no need for an atomic_cmpxchg call; we can use >> atomic_read followed by atomic_write since nobody else will ever reserve >> without the lru spinlock held. >> At least on Intel this should remove a locked bus cycle on successful >> reserve. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> >> > Is that really a good thing to submit when I am busy killing lru lock around reserve? :-) >
If your patch series makes it into the same kernel, let's kill this patch. Otherwise it may live at least for a kernel release. It's not a big thing to rebase against, and I won't complain if your patch adds another atomic read-modify-write op here. :)
/Thomas
| |