Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2 | From | Pantelis Antoniou <> | Date | Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:25:33 +0100 |
| |
On Nov 5, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Pantelis Antoniou > <panto@antoniou-consulting.com> wrote: >> Assuming that we do work on a DT object format, and that the runtime resolution mechanism is approved, >> then I agree that this part of the capebus patches can be dropped and the functionality assumed by generic >> DT core. >> >> The question is that this will take time, with no guarantees that this would be acceptable from >> the device tree maintainers. So I am putting them in the CC list, to see what they think about it. > > This is actually exactly the direction I want to go with DT, which the > ability to load supplemental DT data blobs from either a kernel module > or userspace using the firmware loading infrastructure. > > g.
Hi Grant,
That's pretty much our use case.
Regards
-- Pantelis
| |