lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2
From
Date

On Nov 5, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Grant Likely wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
> <panto@antoniou-consulting.com> wrote:
>> Assuming that we do work on a DT object format, and that the runtime resolution mechanism is approved,
>> then I agree that this part of the capebus patches can be dropped and the functionality assumed by generic
>> DT core.
>>
>> The question is that this will take time, with no guarantees that this would be acceptable from
>> the device tree maintainers. So I am putting them in the CC list, to see what they think about it.
>
> This is actually exactly the direction I want to go with DT, which the
> ability to load supplemental DT data blobs from either a kernel module
> or userspace using the firmware loading infrastructure.
>
> g.

Hi Grant,

That's pretty much our use case.

Regards

-- Pantelis




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-05 15:43    [W:1.794 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site