lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2
    From
    Date

    On Nov 5, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Grant Likely wrote:

    > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
    > <panto@antoniou-consulting.com> wrote:
    >> Assuming that we do work on a DT object format, and that the runtime resolution mechanism is approved,
    >> then I agree that this part of the capebus patches can be dropped and the functionality assumed by generic
    >> DT core.
    >>
    >> The question is that this will take time, with no guarantees that this would be acceptable from
    >> the device tree maintainers. So I am putting them in the CC list, to see what they think about it.
    >
    > This is actually exactly the direction I want to go with DT, which the
    > ability to load supplemental DT data blobs from either a kernel module
    > or userspace using the firmware loading infrastructure.
    >
    > g.

    Hi Grant,

    That's pretty much our use case.

    Regards

    -- Pantelis




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-11-05 15:43    [W:2.992 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site