lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
> button@1 {
> debounce_interval = <50>;
> linux,code = <105>;
> label = "left";
> gpios = <&gpio2 16 0x0>;
> gpio-key,wakeup;
> autorepeat;
> };
>
> Is the "linux,code" pure hardware or have there already been exceptions to that rule?

I generally push back on "linux,blah" bindings since they have the
tendency to change over time when someone changes the driver. However,
since the keycodes are part of the Linux userspace ABI, and are
therefore pretty much set it stone, I didn't object to the
linux,keycode binding. There are already drivers using it.

g.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-05 02:21    [W:0.034 / U:2.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site