lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8] drop if around WARN_ON
On Sun, 4 Nov 2012, Sasha Levin wrote:

> Hi Julia,
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote:
>> These patches convert a conditional with a simple test expression and a
>> then branch that only calls WARN_ON(1) to just a call to WARN_ON, which
>> will test the condition.
>>
>> // <smpl>
>> @@
>> expression e;
>> @@
>>
>> (
>> if(<+...e(...)...+>) WARN_ON(1);
>> |
>> - if (e) WARN_ON(1);
>> + WARN_ON(e);
>> )// </smpl>
>
> So this deals with WARN_ON(), are you considering doing the same for
> the rest of it's friends?

I tried WARN_ON_ONCE, but the pattern never occurred. Are there others
that are worth trying?

thanks,
julia


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-04 17:21    [W:0.100 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site