Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 03 Nov 2012 19:06:44 -0400 | From | Sasha Levin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 21/21] TTY: move tty buffers to tty_port |
| |
On 11/03/2012 11:55 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 11/03/2012 03:03 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: >> On 11/02/2012 12:18 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >>> On 11/02/2012 05:07 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: >>>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> wrote: >>>>> On 10/31/2012 04:59 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: >>>>>> So you probably want a lot more than 100k syscalls, why limit it at >>>>>> all actually? >>>>> >>>>> I unset the limit but I still can't reproduce... >>>>> >>>>>> I've attached my .config for the guest kernel as reference. >>>>> >>>>> Even using this config does not help to reproduce that. >>>>> >>>>> Do you use some special trinity params? >>>> >>>> Not really: >>>> >>>> ./trinity -m --quiet --dangerous -l off >>> >>> Oh, you run that as root?? >>> >>>> Can I add something to my kernel to provide more info when it happens? >>> >>> Maybe the attached patch can tell us more... >>> >> >> Nope, I see the warnings mentioned before, without the new 'HUH' warnings. > > Actually it does. It is exactly as you wrote some time earlier. The work > is scheduled after is was cancelled and should not trigger anymore. Or, > it is scheduled before it is supposed to do. Could you try the attached > patch and report what happens with that patch? > > PS I can't reproduce by whatever I tried. > > thanks, >
Interesting...
[ 388.783955] tty is bad=0 ops= (null)Pid: 6480, comm: kworker/1:2 Tainted: G W 3.7.0-rc3-next-20121102-sasha-00002-gbb570e0-dirty #111
Thanks, Sasha
|  |