lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [ 0/4] 3.0.51-stable review
From
Date
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 07:43 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:45:02AM -0200, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:07:11PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Howdy Greg,
> > > >
> > > > Somehow the following patch is missing for this series submission:
> > > > > Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> > > > > x86: Remove the ancient and deprecated disable_hlt() and enable_hlt() facility
> > > >
> > > > I glanced at the the downloadable consolidated patch and its hunks seem to be present,
> > > > though.
> > >
> > > I do not understand. Where do you not see it? It's in the patch on
> > > kernel.org, right? Where is it missing?
> > >
> >
> > The LKML patch series is missing PATCH 02/04.
>
> Odd, I received a copy, but I don't know if it came from lkml or as a
> copy sent to me directly. I'll bounce it to you if you are curious
> about it.
>

Yeah, 2/4 is missing. Probably had too many Cc's. I really wish David
Miller would remove that limit. I bet it's kept more legitimate emails
from making LKML than it has spam.

I know I've been burnt by it a few times :-/

-- Steve




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-03 17:01    [W:1.089 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site