Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:21:43 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 00/23] printk: refactoring |
| |
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:08:15 -0800 Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 15:26 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:54:10 -0800 > > Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 06:49 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 20:43 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > Make printk a bit more readable. > > > > > > > > Andrew? Are you going to apply this again for -next? > > > > > > Andrew? Any answer? > > > > Backlogged, not lost. Hopefully this week or next week. > > > > I trust it has had more thorough compilation coverage testing > > than v1? > > Well, it's getting to be too late for this series.
Yeah sorry, stuff got in the way, then people patched printk.c.
> When would be the best time to resubmit and get this > into -next?
I think at rc1. Then if all is OK I'd aim at a merge for rc2 or rc3 because these patches are rather a pain to keep alive.
| |