lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH, resend] kfifo: initialize fifo accordingly to C99 standard
From
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:31:11 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> When build a kernel with "make W=1" we will get a warning about missing
>> initializer. It comes from kfifo usage style. The DEFINE_KFIFO macro doesn't
>> initialize the buf[] field of the fifo structure. So, using C99 style helps in
>> such case.
>
> I see no such warning. When fixing warnings or compilation errors,
> please always quote the compiler output in the changelog.

Oh, I did wrong assumption. However, it looks like linux-stable 3.0.y
is affected;

CC [M] samples/kfifo/inttype-example.o
samples/kfifo/inttype-example.c:44:506: warning: missing initializer
[-Wmissing-field-initializers]
samples/kfifo/inttype-example.c:44:506: warning: (near initialization
for ‘(anonymous).buf’) [-Wmissing-field-initializers]

And it seems that my solution not the one which is used in linux-next.

gcc (Debian 4.7.2-2) 4.7.2


--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-29 11:01    [W:0.074 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site